mnarog, Author at Whalen & Company, CPAs

IRS provides penalty relief to certain late filers

mnarog on April 9, 2013

On March 20, the IRS issued guidance providing penalty relief to both individual and business taxpayers who file for an extension of their 2012 tax return and ultimately owe additional tax — but only if they meet certain criteria. First, the reason for filing for the extension must be that the taxpayer’s 2012 return involved forms whose publication was delayed because of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA), signed into law Jan. 2. Here’s a sampling of the delayed forms:

Form 8839: Qualified Adoption Expenses
Form 8863: Education Credits
Form 3800: General Business Credit
Form 5884: Work Opportunity Credit
Form 6765: Credit for Increasing Research Activities
Form 8844: Empowerment Zone Employment Credit
Form 8874: New Markets Credit

In addition, the taxpayer must make a good faith effort when filing for the extension to properly estimate the tax liability. Then that estimated amount must be paid by the return’s original due date, and any additional tax owed must be paid by the return’s extended due date.

If you’re considering filing for an extension due to delayed IRS forms, please contact us to help ensure you’ll qualify for penalty relief.

The revived research credit can still reduce your 2012 tax bill

mnarog on April 4, 2013

For many years, the research credit (also commonly referred to as the “research and development” or “research and experimentation” credit) has provided an incentive for businesses to increase their investments in research. But the credit expired at the end of 2011.

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) extends the credit to 2012 and 2013. You can use the credit for virtually any research that benefits your business. Wages for researchers, the cost of research supplies and the cost of computer licensing for research purposes are all expenses that may qualify for the credit.

The credit is generally equal to a portion of qualified research expenses. It’s complicated to calculate, but the tax savings can be substantial. If you think you may qualify, please contact us for assistance. There’s still time to claim the credit for 2012.

Image courtesy of www.freedigitalphotos.net.

Lower FSA contribution limit may make HSAs more attractive

mnarog on March 27, 2013

Previously, employers could set whatever limit they wanted on employee contributions to Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs) for health care. But starting this year, the maximum limit is $2,500.

If you’re concerned about a lower limit and aren’t contributing to a Health Savings Account (HSA), look into whether you’re eligible — you must be covered by a qualified high-deductible health plan. As with FSA withdrawals, HSA withdrawals for qualified medical expenses are tax-free. But the HSA contribution limits are higher: $3,250 for self-only coverage and $6,450 for family coverage, plus an additional $1,000 for taxpayers age 55 or older.

HSAs also may be more beneficial because they can bear interest or be invested and can grow tax-deferred similar to an IRA. Additionally, you can carry over a balance from year to year. If you have an HSA, however, your FSA is limited to funding certain “permitted” expenses.

An HSA also can provide a way to do some post-Dec. 31 tax planning: You have until the April filing deadline to make your contribution. Please contact us to learn whether you could benefit from an HSA.

Yes, there’s still time to make a 2012 IRA contribution!

mnarog on March 19, 2013

The deadline for 2012 IRA contributions is April 15, 2013. The limit for total contributions to all IRAs generally is $5,000 ($6,000 if you were age 50 or older on Dec. 31, 2012). Any unused limit can’t be carried forward to make larger contributions in future years.

So if you haven’t already maxed out your 2012 limit, consider taking advantage of one of these three contribution options by April 15:

1. Deductible traditional. If you and your spouse don’t participate in an employer-sponsored plan such as a 401(k) — or you do but your income doesn’t exceed certain limits — your traditional IRA contribution is fully deductible on your 2012 tax return. Account growth is tax-deferred; distributions are subject to income tax.

2. Roth. Contributions to a Roth IRA aren’t deductible, but qualified distributions — including growth — are tax-free. Income-based limits may reduce or eliminate your ability to contribute, however.

3. Nondeductible traditional. If your income is too high for you to fully deduct a traditional IRA contribution or make the maximum Roth IRA contribution, you may benefit from a nondeductible contribution to a traditional IRA. The account can still grow tax-deferred, and when you take distributions you’ll be taxed only on the growth. Alternatively, shortly after contributing, you may be able to convert the account to a Roth IRA with minimal tax liability.

Want to know which option best fits your situation? Contact us.

You don’t have to be a manufacturer to take the “manufacturers’ deduction”

mnarog on March 15, 2013

The manufacturers’ deduction, also called the “Section 199” or “domestic production activities deduction,” is 9% of the lesser of qualified production activities income or taxable income. The deduction is also limited to 50% of W-2 wages paid by the taxpayer that are allocable to domestic production gross receipts.

Yes, the deduction is available to traditional manufacturers. But businesses engaged in activities such as construction, engineering, architecture, computer software production and agricultural processing also may be eligible.

The deduction isn’t allowed in determining net self-employment earnings and generally can’t reduce net income below zero. But it can be used against the AMT.

Author: mnarog

News & Tech Tips

IRS provides penalty relief to certain late filers

The revived research credit can still reduce your 2012 tax bill

Lower FSA contribution limit may make HSAs more attractive

Yes, there’s still time to make a 2012 IRA contribution!

You don’t have to be a manufacturer to take the “manufacturers’ deduction”